InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

10baggerz

12/04/22 6:57 PM

#543473 RE: HappyLibrarian #541396

Interesting point, thanks for sharing.
I enjoy reading you, Hopeforthefuture3, and FeMikes posts to balance out the unbridled enthusiasm that many, including myself, feel right now.
icon url

Poor Man -

12/04/22 7:31 PM

#543519 RE: HappyLibrarian #541396

Suppressive fire is not the primary goal, in my opinion. There’s going to be as much incoming fire as there is outgoing. Hence, I believe the late timing of the lawsuit is more to demonstrate to soon-to-be institutional investors that the company is willing to defend its stock price, presumably with having the resources to back it up.

And there might be some thinking that when they exchange into a new company, some of the NWBO legacy issues that Citadel raises might have less impact in terms of public and investor relations.

If it were part of a properly coordinated series the lawsuit or even just an investigation could have been PR’d before the JA/SNO to provide suppressive fire against any shorts and allow a big increase to happen.

icon url

j e d

12/04/22 8:45 PM

#543550 RE: HappyLibrarian #541396

I disagree—they knew the lawsuit would bring big public attention to them, and when that comes you want to have already been validated by JAMA