I think everyone can see that the first update was TOTALLY misleading. It contained incorrect information that caused many (if they acted on it) to have already lost money (at least on paper). Had nothing to do with "dotting I's" or "Crossing T's". Had everything to do with (apparently intentionally) putting out false and misleading info.
They HAD to put out a second "update", because they promised one. But all that second update did was drive the price down FURTHER. It was ambiguous and simply rehashed old and already known information.
I doubt this goes anywhere near 50 cents, never mind $1. Those figures are HARDLY "realistic".
Given the fact that LP added in one of his posts that it might take a little longer than expected for the CE drop shortly after the 10/27 bulletin, I'd say that's certainly a good guess. Going forward, one might proffer that dotting i's and crossing t's class at Harvard be re-visited.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
