InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

tedpeele

10/05/22 11:37 AM

#117764 RE: KCCO7913 #117761

The HCW back in May of this year? There’s always the possibility that that was a premature statement.
icon url

The Great Pumpkin

10/05/22 12:26 PM

#117768 RE: KCCO7913 #117761

Wrong. The material set aka perkinamine may be complete but the ability to scale on devices at a foundry is far from complete. All that matters... This is still a glorified lab experiment.

#scam
icon url

frobinso

10/05/22 1:18 PM

#117775 RE: KCCO7913 #117761

I like the new Holy Grail slide in this latest presentation. I think the new hire is going for it. We already have the lead, and we are now hiring to ensure the future roadmap continues to blow away other technologies.
icon url

tedpeele

10/05/22 11:07 PM

#117856 RE: KCCO7913 #117761

I couldn't find the HC Wainwright presentation, so can't rely on what you stated about the material being satisfactory for commercialization with no further modifications needed.

I would have to hear it myself, as words get changed very quickly with the telephone game, as we recently saw with the pre-ECOC dinner varying interpretations.

That seems an important claim - enough for you to mention it as evidence that all that is left for commercial readiness is the foundries to do their jobs correctly -- so if that's what he was saying, why wouldn't he be saying that in all of his presentations? It's one thing to say they are a different kitchen, but another to say that the recipe doesn't need any changes in order to serve to the masses...Or has he been saying it and I missed it? If so, what page of the Investor Presentation is it on?