Replies to post #52682 on Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[nobody12378]

As you know I/We have been with you and the company forever (well not exactly; since April 2006). We have met, and we have sought out DW and others for face-to-face interactions. I inquire with no malice intended. Your communication raises the question, one that may be naive and demonstrate my ignorance of such matters -- why not declare bankruptcy? Would this not be in your best interest?

[Houstonian]

Kevin,

Thank you for the update. You have reaffirmed my faith in you.

Having been around from the early days I am aware that Greenshift was the victim of an unscrupulous thief (DVG) and of horrible legal advise. Being taken advantage of by thieves and incompetents is easy to criticize in hindsight, I won't do that.

I appreciate your continued efforts on the shareholders behalf. Trust me - I wish you all the luck in the world.

Thank you again.
Houstonian

[Slashnuts]

Restart The Litigation From Scratch...

Don't be discouraged by a few corrupt judges and crooked lawyers.

The 2003 spin test in the gyro didn't practice the methods. (Plumtree) The USPTO agrees.

Cantrell didn't know if it would work for it's intended purpose until it was tested (confidentially) under actual conditions. He felt the need for additional testing since the gyro had much higher G forces than the testing partners centrifuge.

Agri-Energy began the 2004 test by centrifuging thin stillage, not syrup. Continued testing was the first time oil was extracted from syrup with a centrifuge without plugging.

Oil seperation in a test tube from a high speed gyro didn't practice the methods by any means.

Barlage was all over the place, suggesting in plant testing to determine the best methods.

Cantrell and Winsness knew about the on sale bar in 2004 and would've filed if they thought it was an issue. But they were still testing and refining the methods.

Cantrell offered AgriEnergy the first system for their assistance. Assistance in what? Not their assistance in a sale, but assistance in testing to prove it would work for it's intended purpose in an actual ethanol plant.

Hello,
First, let me congratulate you on a very successful first test. Remember, removing the oil from the syrup has never been done 'before. The initial testing at the lab was successful in removing the oil from the syrup after the evaporator but not before the evaporator. Since the
table-top gyro has a much higher G force than the centrifuge, we could not know the outcome until we ran the syrup through a commercial test system. Also, it is VERY IMPORTANT to keep the test and testing results confidential. I am asking everyone included in this e-mail to honor this. Since Agri Energy is our testing partner, the first system and the benefits of early marketing opportunities will be offered to you for your assistance. Cantrell 2004

"Keeping it confidential until we are ready so we can solicit the entire market at once."Winsness

. The possible methods for doing this separation would require two steps.   Further in plant testing will be required to fully determine the best method of commercialization for this process.Barlage

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=156466068

Good Luck To All!$!$

[Slashnuts]

Recent Headlines Indicate Corruption Within The Judicial System...

Judge's are often wrong, reversed and sometimes corrupt.

The offer to test was just that, an incentive to test. No jury would determine anything but. Just look at the comments that proceeded the offer letter...

Hello,
First, let me congratulate you on a very successful first test. Remember, removing the oil from the syrup has never been done 'before. The initial testing at the lab was successful in removing the oil from the syrup after the evaporator but not before the evaporator. Since the
table-top gyro has a much higher G force than the centrifuge, we could not know the outcome until we ran the syrup through a commercial test system. Also, it is VERY IMPORTANT to keep the test and testing results confidential. I am asking everyone included in this e-mail to honor this. Since Agri Energy is our testing partner, the first system and the benefits of early marketing opportunities will be offered to you for your assistance. Cantrell

"Keeping it confidential until we are ready so we can solicit the entire market at once." Winsness

"Further in plant testing will be required to fully determine the best method of commercialization for this process." Barlage

Test, testing and testing results. Doesn't sound like they were ready to me. Sounds like they were testing. If they were ready to sell, why call it a testing partner/system after the fact? Why ask for further testing? Why say the outcome couldn't be known? Why ask to keep it confidential if you're ready to solicit?

Good Lord, he called Agri-Energy the testing partner and wanted to test it in a commercial test system before any potential on-sale bar. HELLO?
Greenshift had the right and responsibility to test the system and the USPTO agreed.

Greed and Evil. Agri-Energy should be ashamed of themselves.

Restart the litigation, funding will follow...

Good Luck To All!$!$