Replies to post #30264 on Harrison Vickers & Waterman Inc (HVCW)

[mick]

how about 37 positions fer $HVCW
modernprosolutions.com
Modern Pro Solutions | Our Team

[bluebird50]

Interesting….

[ranger_7]

Very interesting! Looking forward to more updates here!

[Smilin_B]

Our corporate office is in Southern California… All I can say is California is not the only thing on fire this month @modernprosol Is having the strongest start to the month since inception! September will be HUGE!!! $hvcw $sirc

— Bobby Tetsch (@bobby_tetsch) September 3, 2022

[m$teamworkotc]

JUST ANOTHER CON ARTIST---NOW 5 INVOLVED WITH THIS dilution MACHINE
https://www.cslb.ca.gov/CompletedPDF/Accusations/N2017-309/N2017-309-20190620-Decision.pdf

Marrilla Project
5. On November 7, 2016, Bobby Tetsch, an unregistered salesperson
representing respondent, met with Maria Rodriguez at her home in Norwalk, California, to
discuss the benefits of solar installation. As Ms. Rodriguez is primarily Spanish speaking,
her daughter, Claudia Ruiz, was present at the meeting and provided translation. During the
sales presentation, Mr. Tetsch asked to view Ms. Rodriguez's utility bills. After he reviewed
her bills, he informed Ms. Rodriguez that she could have solar panels installed for less than
her current utility payment of $95.00 a month. The worksheet Mr. Tetsch provided Ms.
Rodriguez showed that if she signed "today," the cost of the 25-year program would be
$21,075, with a fixed program payment of $84.66 a month. (Exhibit 7.)
6. Ms. Rodriguez expressed to Mr. Tetsch that she was concerned about the
condition of her roof as she had not replaced her roof during the approximately 20 years she
had owned her home. Mr. Tetsch claimed that another benefit of the solar panels was that
the panels would "protect the roof." (Exhibit 7.) He also assured Ms. Rodriguez that a
licensed professional would inspect the condition of her roof and that the panels would not
be installed unless it was determined that her roof was suitable for solar installation. Mr.
Tetsch further assured Ms. Rodriguez that she had nine days to cancel the transaction. Based
on these assurances, Ms. Rodriguez agreed to enter into the contract with respondent. Ms.
Rodriguez electrically signed the agreement Mr. Tetsch presented to her on his laptop but
was not provided a hard copy of the contract. Mr. Tetsch did, however, provide Ms.
Rodriguez with a "Three-Day Right to Cancel" notice. The notice, however, was written in
English.
7. When Ms. Rodriguez subsequently received and reviewed the agreement, she
discovered that the purchase price for the solar panel system was $38,283, not the $21,075,
she was quoted. Ms. Rodriguez contacted respondent and spoke with Genesis Zorilla, who
was able to communicate with respondent in Spanish, and verbally cancelled the contract.

[BrassBalls420]

Synergy! What a Great Play (with Bobby Tetsch in the House and Massive Revenue)...TOGETHER WE WILL WIN! -GL!