Followers | 285 |
Posts | 51194 |
Boards Moderated | 4 |
Alias Born | 12/28/2006 |
![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/89955.png?cb=1650355029)
Tuesday, September 06, 2022 6:06:39 PM
https://www.cslb.ca.gov/CompletedPDF/Accusations/N2017-309/N2017-309-20190620-Decision.pdf
Marrilla Project
5. On November 7, 2016, Bobby Tetsch, an unregistered salesperson
representing respondent, met with Maria Rodriguez at her home in Norwalk, California, to
discuss the benefits of solar installation. As Ms. Rodriguez is primarily Spanish speaking,
her daughter, Claudia Ruiz, was present at the meeting and provided translation. During the
sales presentation, Mr. Tetsch asked to view Ms. Rodriguez's utility bills. After he reviewed
her bills, he informed Ms. Rodriguez that she could have solar panels installed for less than
her current utility payment of $95.00 a month. The worksheet Mr. Tetsch provided Ms.
Rodriguez showed that if she signed "today," the cost of the 25-year program would be
$21,075, with a fixed program payment of $84.66 a month. (Exhibit 7.)
6. Ms. Rodriguez expressed to Mr. Tetsch that she was concerned about the
condition of her roof as she had not replaced her roof during the approximately 20 years she
had owned her home. Mr. Tetsch claimed that another benefit of the solar panels was that
the panels would "protect the roof." (Exhibit 7.) He also assured Ms. Rodriguez that a
licensed professional would inspect the condition of her roof and that the panels would not
be installed unless it was determined that her roof was suitable for solar installation. Mr.
Tetsch further assured Ms. Rodriguez that she had nine days to cancel the transaction. Based
on these assurances, Ms. Rodriguez agreed to enter into the contract with respondent. Ms.
Rodriguez electrically signed the agreement Mr. Tetsch presented to her on his laptop but
was not provided a hard copy of the contract. Mr. Tetsch did, however, provide Ms.
Rodriguez with a "Three-Day Right to Cancel" notice. The notice, however, was written in
English.
7. When Ms. Rodriguez subsequently received and reviewed the agreement, she
discovered that the purchase price for the solar panel system was $38,283, not the $21,075,
she was quoted. Ms. Rodriguez contacted respondent and spoke with Genesis Zorilla, who
was able to communicate with respondent in Spanish, and verbally cancelled the contract.
Disclaimer: I am not a paid promoter, broker nor an officer of a
public company. My posts should not be construed as a
recommendation to buy or sell securities.
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM