InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Carjockey2

09/06/22 6:08 PM

#30281 RE: m$teamworkotc #30279

I hope the dilution keeps on coming I'm green I like green dilution..
icon url

m$teamworkotc

09/06/22 6:15 PM

#30289 RE: m$teamworkotc #30279

BOBBY JUST ANOTHER 2 BIT HUSTLER/FRAUDSTER
icon url

zombywolf

09/06/22 7:30 PM

#30305 RE: m$teamworkotc #30279

Solar is the new "aluminum siding" in home sales. Watch the movie "Tin Men", pretty close to what you posted. Always remember, if a rep comes to your house, he will say anything to put your name on a deal. And will get half of what you agree to pay for the product. Perfect fit to make a deal with a Canouse.
icon url

12ka

09/07/22 9:25 AM

#30341 RE: m$teamworkotc #30279

how do you think Bobby finds these two a@@hole brothers
icon url

m$teamworkotc

09/07/22 9:38 AM

#30348 RE: m$teamworkotc #30279

JUST ANOTHER CON ARTIST---NOW 5 INVOLVED WITH THIS dilution MACHINE
https://www.cslb.ca.gov/CompletedPDF/Accusations/N2017-309/N2017-309-20190620-Decision.pdf

Marrilla Project
5. On November 7, 2016, Bobby Tetsch, an unregistered salesperson
representing respondent, met with Maria Rodriguez at her home in Norwalk, California, to
discuss the benefits of solar installation. As Ms. Rodriguez is primarily Spanish speaking,
her daughter, Claudia Ruiz, was present at the meeting and provided translation. During the
sales presentation, Mr. Tetsch asked to view Ms. Rodriguez's utility bills. After he reviewed
her bills, he informed Ms. Rodriguez that she could have solar panels installed for less than
her current utility payment of $95.00 a month. The worksheet Mr. Tetsch provided Ms.
Rodriguez showed that if she signed "today," the cost of the 25-year program would be
$21,075, with a fixed program payment of $84.66 a month. (Exhibit 7.)
6. Ms. Rodriguez expressed to Mr. Tetsch that she was concerned about the
condition of her roof as she had not replaced her roof during the approximately 20 years she
had owned her home. Mr. Tetsch claimed that another benefit of the solar panels was that
the panels would "protect the roof." (Exhibit 7.) He also assured Ms. Rodriguez that a
licensed professional would inspect the condition of her roof and that the panels would not
be installed unless it was determined that her roof was suitable for solar installation. Mr.
Tetsch further assured Ms. Rodriguez that she had nine days to cancel the transaction. Based
on these assurances, Ms. Rodriguez agreed to enter into the contract with respondent. Ms.
Rodriguez electrically signed the agreement Mr. Tetsch presented to her on his laptop but
was not provided a hard copy of the contract. Mr. Tetsch did, however, provide Ms.
Rodriguez with a "Three-Day Right to Cancel" notice. The notice, however, was written in
English.
7. When Ms. Rodriguez subsequently received and reviewed the agreement, she
discovered that the purchase price for the solar panel system was $38,283, not the $21,075,
she was quoted. Ms. Rodriguez contacted respondent and spoke with Genesis Zorilla, who
was able to communicate with respondent in Spanish, and verbally cancelled the contract.