InvestorsHub Logo

peafunke

09/05/22 11:46 AM

#136064 RE: stokmonkey #136061

As Murphy dog stated and it’s in the filings, they sold 5 units ? They did that in what… a years time frame ? Competing against an industry already entrenched ? They saw an opportunity, it was different than ‘the tents’ and no one knew where the humorous was heading nor when the vaccine was coming. Imo they did great in the time frame putting all those pieces together, picking up CLIA lab and getting it out there. Yes. It didn’t have the traction since it competed against much bigger pockets. Say what you want.

peafunke

09/05/22 12:13 PM

#136066 RE: stokmonkey #136061

I’m just dying portable labs exist.

Here is a better example showing the positive impacts:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(22)00167-0/fulltext


While this was done in a van, a sprinter van would be more expensive to upstart. Albeit better equipped to move to hot spots. The article speaks about the tests being used and it’s reasoning.

It was a novel idea that was tried. The fact that they got that far m, imo, is remarkable especially during Covid itself. The labs also are able to process a whole slew of other ailments. Lastly, not all processing would be done on sight and would use 5g for data transmission for high speed processing / cloud computing or specialized processing that wasn’t in the cargo boxes.

https://thenewstack.io/the-role-of-edge-computing-and-5g-in-healthcare/

Again. Good idea but didn’t get traction Imo. I still think there is a need for this type of health care and distributed labs. The thing is large company lobbying efforts help shape those rules that may prevent this.