Replies to post #16794 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[RootOfTrust]

Barge, a fabulous, highly logical post!

You point to the evidence...namely that TC has been in the works since the TCPA was founded with Wave participating along the way, but yet only Wave offers an attestation server (which btw includes the inaugaral, soon to be released services of KTM and ACM ). Surely the giants with their unlimited sorces would have sliced of the attestation piece of the pie to be split up as they see fit, but apparently it made sense to let Wave handle this. It's plausible because Wave has devloped their expertise for this role in developing Embassy.

barge, your line of reasoning supports the plausible notion that the role of Gatekeeper should go to an independent like Wave.

Bravo!

[bowWAVE]

barge - right on! I strongly suggest that wavoids read some of the information at https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/downloads/

at a minimum
Trusted Computing Group Writing Trusted Applications
and
Frequently Asked Questions

I think it's a very good education.

regards,
bowWAVE

P.S. Sorry I can't remember who originally posted the url but thanks.

[tampa123]

Barge - I love your passion. You wirte:

"For example, to reduce WAVE to a Software Utility Company renders WAVE vulnerable to every software company in the computing universe".

Exactly correct! And what they are today (what they are currently selling) versus what they will become, or could offer are miles apart. If I didn't believe as you do, that Wave is so much more than what the public sees, then I wouldn't be in this investment.

But, as far as the public is concerned (today), Wave is only a software utility company, which is a significant departure than what the Embassy chipset harware/software solution they have professed to be for the past several years.

Simply put, what they are now in the market versus what they will become over time in the market are two different things. The only difference between our perceptions of what Wave is, is that you refuse to recognize what they are today, and want only to speak of Wave at some point in the future, and I'm okay talking about Wave in both the present and future.

They are what they are, and they will become what they will become. However, my investment only reflects what they are right now.

I can't wait until our investments reflect what we both believe Wave can become. It's not a difference of opinion, it's fact versus forward-looking.

T123