Replies to post #253928 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[sylvia07]

Well said, CD_98!

[Stock_Barber]

That is a wonderful piece of revisionist history!

However, anyone who actually watched the history unfold here knows that nothing went down the way you are presenting it!

Accepting revocation (as the SEC recommended) was only step one. It was to be followed by issuing fresh quarterly reports, for l believe a year, and then reapplying for the OTC.

That path would have been quicker and cheaper than the current one! AND shareholders would still have their shares.

They broke what rules? For the love of Pete... they didn't file for almost 3 years and ignored the SEC's warning letters!

ID say a little more... no a LOT more... DD is in order...

And as always... EVERYONE SHOULD DO THEIR OWN DD!


.

[otterman]

In effect you are saying Linda just should have folded the tent, do I have that right?

Nope. Never said any such thing. I posted how it should have gone.

They broke what rules exactly?

Seriously? Youre arguing and dont even know the rules?

The ALJ Judge did not see it that way.

Actually she did - "The allegations in the OIP were PROVEN."

the case would not have been dismissed.

It wasnt. Why was the judge searching for an appropriate penalty if they were not guilty?

Seems to me she saved D*BMM from the grey sheets, again PINK CURRENT, and D*BMM trades in Canada with no less then 5 or 6 MMs.

This has been discussed 1000s of times. They got moved up via a rule change and NOT BY ANYTHING LINDA DID.

Well sir, she obviously has up to this point.

This holds no water. The only accomplishment was aquiring DC and shes messed that up beyond belief. Read the filings from day 1. Failure after failure. Much of it has been posted here many times.

[Harley16]

Spot on!!! My sentiments exactly