InvestorsHub Logo

Invest83838

05/23/22 7:19 AM

#378227 RE: marjac #378222

Great Response Marjac

Proves you are the expert we need

Meowza

05/23/22 11:20 AM

#378240 RE: marjac #378222

agree with your fairly non-controversial conclusion that the SCOTUS looks for broader implications and generally does not take

cases limited to individual circumstances

Gotta disagree with you there, chief. Last time Amarin got spurned by SCOTUS, the latter was busy with a docket full of Tsarnaev re-litigation and some abo relitigation. Both of those being by definition highly personal situations, full stop. In defense of SCOTUS those topics were all the rage.

Nonetheless SCOTUS too often acts like a post-peak TicToc influencer straining for relevance, instead of acting like the 9 best jurists in history.