InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 35
Posts 6943
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/31/2020

Re: marjac post# 378222

Monday, 05/23/2022 11:20:21 AM

Monday, May 23, 2022 11:20:21 AM

Post# of 426330

agree with your fairly non-controversial conclusion that the SCOTUS looks for broader implications and generally does not take

cases limited to individual circumstances

Gotta disagree with you there, chief. Last time Amarin got spurned by SCOTUS, the latter was busy with a docket full of Tsarnaev re-litigation and some abo relitigation. Both of those being by definition highly personal situations, full stop. In defense of SCOTUS those topics were all the rage.

Nonetheless SCOTUS too often acts like a post-peak TicToc influencer straining for relevance, instead of acting like the 9 best jurists in history.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News