Good points......what I truly do not understand is why any person holding shares of UOIP would give credence to information or advice coming from opposing counsel or opposing parties. As I think I've noted here before, introducing doubt and misinformation is commonly used by attorneys - if not complete misinformation, at least shaded information certainly. I've even had attorneys that were supposedly working for me and that I was paying tell me things that proved false, and they knew it at the time. I know LT saw my point in a post or two not long ago.....opposing counsel and opposing parties have a vested interest in shareholders giving up and going away. They have no vested interest in helping shareholders.
You enumerate valid questions and points in your posts - what do you think about my question?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
