Who saw who in court is meaningless. Hearsay, weak, but I will believe you!
I could say, I saw Billy in the Bahamas, or Morroco, or Shekelsville, and he spent the entire settlement. Would you believe me? Of course you would, I just said it! Hearsay, no evidence to support the claim though.
I can say, after 6 years of litigation against the 13 major cable companies, Billy, Whitman, Brauerman, lost the case. Maybe Biily and crew settled with the 13, saying, you got us, what terms would you agree to. Speculation and Opinion, documented with no facts. I just said it, must be true.
Maybe opposing counsel said, you pay your own legal fees. Although the patents are legitimate, we will give you a few bucks for them, don't tell anyone we gave you any money, because it would put the cable industry in heavy distress and may distroy they industry. Then the White House would get involved. Opinion and hearsay, backed by no facts or documents. Extremely believable!
I can say, if Spangenberg and Leanne did not pursue international infringement, it goes against what they do. They probably figured, we don't need that money. Hearsay again, maybe a made up Opinion. Yet you should belive me.
I hope Brauerman, Whitman can find work after taking on a case that failed. Who will be willing to hire these folks, who had a golden egg, that just so happened to land in their lap, yet laid an egg in a, settlement agreement!.
