It was good that he shared the source. He has no credibility. At least he has a source.
It would seem that he used to attack DCVax as garbage, then the journal came out, and he could not say that anymore. He tried to deride UK journalists who were covering it at BBC and major outlets as shoddy journalists at one point, but obviously that would not fly. Even some US outlets covered the interim published data, including US News.
Then also, Dr. Liau took a prominent role in talking about the drug. He had already gone after her when she said everyone was living longer, making it seem like she had definitively said that the trial had failed, which she had not said. Then when the articles came out in the UK, not only did he go after the press, but he started to denounce Dr. Liau as some sort of Yahoo who did not know what she was doing and wasn't really all that smart. And of course that was a bad tack and he stoppped.
His current argument is that NWBO doesn't own the rights 1) to DCVax-L; and 2) that ATL-DC is not DCVax. These arguments appear to be false duds, based on his lack of any convincing evidence, but it's what he has got.
All IMHO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
