InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ilovetech

02/20/22 10:39 AM

#371254 RE: marjac #371240

While they took a pass on clarifying how Graham factors ought to be weighed. The refusal to take it up, has caused further confusion. But EPADI'S case was a gigantic elephant in the room impossible to miss. They swallowed fraud like a sip of morning coffee. BP controls everything, as their power exceeds the power of Govt's, not just domestically, but internationally. The fix had to have been in. Too many Murphy's law events to blame it on bad luck. When viewed in totality, it's obvious to me, that the orders were made, and the courts, at least the Judges under their control have followed them.


I wish I was wrong, but in view of knowing that 25% of the Federal Courts have been captured and controlled, a feet that took a decade to fullfil, this piece of business would seem to be exploited by those dark forces.

ILT
icon url

north40000

02/20/22 11:42 AM

#371263 RE: marjac #371240

You may like the Daikin Industries v. Chemours Co. petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court just as much. It was reviewed today by Dennis Crouch in his Patently-O Daily Review titled "Flagrant Fact Finding at the Federal Circuit". According to Dennis, the petition here is supported by Judge Dyk's dissent in the Daikin case where he argued that the majority opinion was "nothing less than appellate fact-finding."[There is a lot more in the Daily Review]