This is exactly my feelings with all my investments. Just counterproductive to do otherwise. The only thing I have not done with this investment is contact Henry which I generally do with all CEO's of companies I am invested with.
NOTE: Seems the algos always remove with that word with the underscores.
Henry has a lot on his plate and from what I gather he is bombed with emails, text messages, phone calls etc. One of the things I agree with Butchmass on is Henry needs help from a Public Relations person to handle most of this for him. And I'm sure in time when revenues flow he will hire that help.
Many investors, even myself at times sit in front of our computers watching tick by tick, writing and answering social media messages/message boards all day long, some complaining all day long, etc. If Henry did this, answering the hundreds or maybe even thousands of messages he gets all day long one would need to ask where would he have the time to get any PHIL business done.
Soon, when the stock holds over a penny. I will contact Henry and just tell him "THANK YOU" for all his hard work and efforts to make PHIL a success, with no expectation of a response back. If the CEO is not performing and I have any of the investment left I will simply sell and move on, and perhaps send them a disgruntled message without expectation of a response. Been doing this long enough to know not all micro penny or penny plays work out, in fact most don't. PHIL will be one that does IMHO. And I believe BIGGLY!
Sure we always need to be able from time to time connect with the CEO but he is a very busy man and he needs to "FOCUS" as Militia Man always says.
Can you provide 1 good reason as to why this “not a regular OTC stock” that is becoming a multi-billion dollar conglomerate would not grow past being a 1 man show?