Perhaps what I am missing.. Are the posters like myself whose limited biology knowledge allows them to see things differently Like Ted Lasso coaching soccer..
Yes there are some potentially dangerous assumptions..
A3-71 is as potent an S1r agonist as a3-72, without the metabolite power a3-72..
Ok.. but.. a3-71 has no known digestive limit to dosing..again.. safety AND minimal(zero) negative side effects.
Now.. a3-72 has married and repeated its animal clinical trials very closely.. Yes.. it’s an assumption that a3-71 will do the same. But the molecules are derived in a similar form.. so it’s not a leap and jump .. it’s just a step..and now since we have proved safe… it’s a safe step..
SAFE
So please all you dreamers.. let us delve a little deeper .. pretend like a3-71 is our first and only drug..what are the ten year possibilities of helping people..
The counterarguments will probably retreat into a corner along the lines of:
"bUt iT iS oNlY iN mIcE!" "iT's NoT dOuBlE bLiNdEd PlAcEbO!" "tHeY mEaSuReD tHe WrOnG sCoReS!" "ThEy CaN't KeEp ThEiR tImElInEs!" "MiSsLiNg Is A dOo DoO hEaD wItH sTuPiD hAiR!"