Well, we won’t know though.
Something made NWBO change their minds in that month before October 5th. when strategy went from “believing TLD to come within weeks”, till wanting a journal to support the data.
I bet what we’ve been thinking and discussing of scenarioes the last year, NWBO have also. And somehow they must have believed “the opposition” to be able to hurt them, had they gone out in the open with TLD in March as an example.
During the quiet period, NWBO have been MHRA certified. They have been peer reviewing. Progressing on Flaskworks. Building out Sawston.
Having opted for TLD would obviously also have required working time in order to refute accusations and claims and why not also more fake judiciury lawsuits? There are lots of ways to trick NWBO to spend and divert precious time to refute fud.
SP higher than $0,70 absolutely, but I’m not sure we’d been at $2 now. And would NWBO have managed to progress as much as they’ve done, if they haven’t had complete quiet to do so?
When TLD comes, I believe the benefits will be obvious to us. And that the decision was thoughtful.