InvestorsHub Logo

tkg

12/15/21 4:53 AM

#86642 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

Excellent Richard, as always, thank you pointing this out!

SteveSchiets

12/15/21 4:59 AM

#86643 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

Great Richard! Thanks you for high lining us this important piece of the presentation. Simply huge!

prototype_101

12/15/21 5:58 AM

#86644 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

Richard, excellent quote from Lebby, could you provide the link for us all to which presentation that came from, tia

tradero

12/15/21 6:58 AM

#86646 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

Thanks Richard... Now, it is interesting the current fight between CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) solutions versus pluggable solutions... because in both cases if they want to make a significant difference to the other solution, whichever help they get (i.e. electrical polymers) should be really welcome. Otherwise they may lose the battle

Anyway, I really doubt that in both cases they agree to boicot this new tech for whichever reason. It wouldnt make sense

frobinso

12/15/21 8:25 AM

#86652 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

That is an amazing response by Dr. Lebby. Thanks for sharing the Q&A.

Rkf302

12/15/21 8:44 AM

#86654 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

Richard, great catch! Thanks.

pitcook

12/15/21 9:14 AM

#86655 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

Thanks, as always you are the voice of science and facts which is the reason to be on these MB's. We know every facet of a computer chip needs our material (the U word) and we have done thousands of hours of T-1 testing. Not that I am impatient, (16 or 17 years of ownership) but from your educated technical understanding, what is missing for any of these potentially thousands of customers, that would have tremendous upgrades, using the GOO, from signing a contract? What is still missing from the equation?

microchips

12/15/21 9:28 AM

#86657 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

Thanks Richard. 2 Questions... First. what is the difference between CPOs and pluggable transceivers? Secondly, why do the short connections use 1310 nanometers and the long connections 1550?

theroc66

12/15/21 10:12 AM

#86660 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

Thank you Richard!
As always, you bring a professional opinion to this board that casts a terrific additional light to the developing scene!
Thank you for your ongoing contribution.

Happy Holidays!

GLTAL
AR.

Scope08

12/15/21 10:20 AM

#86662 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

Thanks to you and the more astute technical investors Richard, for explaining this to us. The tech nuances are lost on most of us. We appreciate it.

Pro_v12001

12/15/21 10:43 AM

#86664 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641


https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/optical-interconnect-market-89222473.html






The less than 1 km distance segment projected to grow at the highest CAGR from 2020 to 2025.
In 2019, the less than 1 km segment held the largest share of the optical interconnect market. This segment is expected to lead the market during the forecast period. The growth of the less than 1 km segment can be attributed to the transitioning of large-scale datacenters toward the adoption of high data rate components, including optical interconnects for data communication. Datacenters transmit data over short distances and require a high data transmission rate for transferring huge packets of information. The increasing requirement of high-speed communication in datacenters is also driving the market for high data rate optical interconnects such as 100G and 400G for a distance of less than 1 km.

theroc66

12/15/21 10:58 AM

#86669 RE: Richard_LaRiv #86641

Richard,
Is it ok for me to repost this on other forums?
With credits of course.
AR.