InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

eightisenough

11/04/21 1:03 PM

#358940 RE: ggwpq #358923

**gg&kiwi-terrible news! if true-that judge disregarded magistrate opinion--kiwi, I would lower dramatically success of the infringement suit to 40%.

And even if Judge Andrew allows case to continue--a judge with such bias=amrn is heading likely for a loss and an appeal.....2 more years...

eie
icon url

sstyles

11/04/21 1:17 PM

#358946 RE: ggwpq #358923

It is important to understand the context and rules of civil procedure governing these cases. You cannot just take a quote like that and imply Judge Andrews wants to dismiss the case.

Hikma and HealthNet objected to the recommendation of the magistrate judge who was assigned to this case. The magistrate judge handles a lot of the pretrial orders to help as judges have a lot on their plate. Judicial economy and efficiency. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the case NOT be dismissed and because Hikma and HealthNet objected to this recommendation, Judge Andrews granted them a 10 minute oral hearing to make their case.

Facts matter.