Replies to post #348718 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Jasbg]

north,

Most of the time I was correct in my prediction; sometimes I was surprised.

You mean 'You were Wrong' - just teasing :)
------------------------

Looking form the outside (being a lay person in Law) - In all the debates that has been about the Nevada patent Case - I have not seen any 'knowledgeable person in Law' support the Judge Du ruling - not One'.

Completely neglecting - the serious work of other, in the subject much more qualified authorities' eg. in qualifying patents (which is a complicated process).

Some say Nevada ruling was Political (generics is generally cheaper) - others say that the Judge were just making a name for herself - not really knowing - the deep scientific subject she was being asked to rule upon.

Lets hope AC will finally accept Marjac Rule60 filing and set things straight :)

Jasbg

[sts66]

I think he was asking whether you could deduce what the defense would focus on during the trial from depositions, not whether you could predict what the judge or jury would decide. Given the depositions in this case took what, 2 years, and transcripts were probably hundreds of thousands of pages, I'm not sure you could tease out the defense's plans ahead of time unless they spent a ton of time on a couple issues, making it obvious. When the Allies were prepping France for invasion in WW2, they bombed the entire coast from Normandy to Calais so the Germans couldn't guess where the landings were going to take place - if I were a legal team I'd do something similar, spread out my lines of questioning among many different targets to not tip off the plaintiffs of my plan of attack.