soulsave, I love how some use the term "falsely". Of course any logical person would be able to recognize the difference between "falsely" and "incorrect". Since they continued to fail to file as required for another six years, the point is mute. In my opinion the regulator did this as they get ready to take their next steps and for them to have issued a statement in response to the ridiculous assertions made on social media about the Atacama Resources variation order was a surprise, but a welcome surprise as stock promoters continue their trend of falsely representing the facts to suit their needs, which we know of course is to profit from anothers loss. The truth will of course win out in the end, regardless of whether someone makes an alleged 300% gain or 300% loss-it is not a matter of some making profits, that is obvious, but whether or not the company actually does anything which to date they have not accomplished anything towards having the cease trade order lifted in Canada.
Falsely would indicate no merit, while incorrectly means they got a date wrong, as one can see from the confirmation of the cease trader order and the additional dates added (which some think is now a good thing) to the order. Cease trade orders can be varied as we have seen with Atacama to allow some Canadian investors, upon a successful application to sell their holdings.
Good night.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
