Why do you discuss your speculations on an individual case (anecdotal) as proof of your contention?
It’s hard to imagine you didn’t follow Dr. Prins and Liau’s studies and Dr.Liau’s interview discussions regarding proneural and idh mutation. Since 2011, they have been aware proneural might not respond as well to DCVax-l. https://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/17/6/1603
In interviews, including one with co-interviewee Dr. Cobb, (years ago) Dr. Liau discussed idh mutant as something different than typical GBM, and she’d typically not refer those compassionate cases toward DCVax-l treatment.
I agree that L may be effective with other high-grade gliomas. (the small phase I trial extended survival in some patients) You probably know that UCLA has been running an open label, phase II trial with various adjuvant combinations for malignant gliomas [anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), anaplastic astro-oligodendroglioma (AO)], as well as glioblastoma. I think Dr. Liau and others at UCLA have a pretty good idea who responds to DCVAx, and are looking at adjuvant and checkpoint combinations in an attempt to expand effectiveness in others who are less responsive.
A Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating Autologous Dendritic Cells Pulsed With Tumor Lysate Antigen +/- Toll-like Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Malignant Glioma