InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Monk44

06/28/21 9:09 PM

#345409 RE: Pharmacydude #345408

There you go LM, from the expert, PDude.
icon url

sstyles

06/28/21 9:15 PM

#345411 RE: Pharmacydude #345408

Could be a market in the USA for the anti-vaxers.

Will be interesting to see if the stock price reacts to the August presentation / late-breaker.

icon url

Laurent Maldague

06/28/21 9:37 PM

#345412 RE: Pharmacydude #345408

Thanks, I suspect the same regarding patents based on CardioLink-9. The distinct dosing regime is also a very good point.

With regards to ECLA and KP, I've done some searching on IP and investigator-initiated trials. Seems like it's standard for the PI's institution to sell off (assign) or exclusively license any patents generated from such trials.

https://dsp.research.uiowa.edu/investigator-initiated-clinical-trials

https://clinicaltrials.usc.edu/intellectual-property-terms-in-research-agreements/

Perhaps the end result will be something similar to CVD patents (a mixture of licensed patents from Mochida + in-house IP from Reduce IT.)

I agree the generics are going to sell with disregard for their approved indication, but the smaller their piece of the pie (legally speaking), the better for our infringement case.
icon url

ralphey

06/29/21 8:22 AM

#345433 RE: Pharmacydude #345408

PD .... based on what you say if AMRN just revised their name to VAscepa-CAD meaning vascepa for CAD - this would prevent all CAD infringement ?