"Arguing that the law they wrote, which included their verbage about no judicial review, is laughable to them, I bet. Congress trying to insulate their laws and plans from the other two branches of our goverment is a treasonus subversion and bastardization of the basic constitution."
All these things are full of conflict of interests.
Is it not the judiciary/scotus that has allowed politicians to subvert constitution and rule of law?
If politicians were to know for sure that the judiciary will not allow such laws to stand then they wont be passing such laws.
Look at how most lower courts have ruled so far on HERA provisions that subvert constitution and rule of law. These lower courts/judges have spent all their time to guess the intentions of politicians rather than that of constitution. These judges themselves do not understand the laws passed by these politicians.
Should not these judges be interpreting the laws based on constitution and regular meaning of language rather than try to guess the intentions of politicians?
Why would scotus need more than 6 months to rule on the questions of law? Should common people be held responsible for not understanding most of these laws?
Let us hope that SCOTUS understands the sufferings of the FnF shareholders and resolves the petition in favor of the shareholders.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
