That sounds reasonable, but the case is not over while there is an appeal pending at the SC - where does the law say "if the FC confirms a DC decision that a patent is invalid that's the end of the story"?
Oneragman Right in relation to the sale by Hikma as GV -but only for non CV application - the Delaware case is all about H infringement-by selling to CV usage for which patents remain entirely valid - so you have to split your analysis accordingly Alm
I'm not an attorney, but would not Hikma be liable if in fact they would be found guilty of fraud on the courts by their lies and the cropped table which then allowed DU to take the wrong path on obviousness?