Replies to post #342049 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[oneragman]

lb, that may be true, but that is what the Delaware case is all about. No one is holding Hikma for infringement of the RI patents without a trial. One point I will make on that. Yesterday JT told Mike Yee that Hikma has less than 10% of the market. I would bet a whole lot of money that if the SC restores the patents and Hikma withdraws, the Delaware case will simply be dismissed/withdrawn.

[rosemountbomber]

Louie, would have to agree with you that after #4, Hikma would not be infringing on Marine but as what has occurred in real life, they have infringed in R-I patents.

Now if after #4, hikma, their label, docs, and insurers made sure and took steps to avoid infringement of R-I patents then Raggy scenario would be correct.

[ziploc_1]

Amarin is more interested in recovery their stolen property than in making Hickma pay for their infringing.