Replies to post #87724 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[long uoip]

it's just a hunch, but I'm not intuiting that carter or the legal team will bend to the 13 low balling them
given the events of the last trial, it's obvious who has the upper hand
I think carter is ruthless, thus will negotiate the valuation he has already specifically in mind
our legal team utilized 0.40 per modem to align with not overstepping "excessive damage" appeals down the line
I'm in agreement with AllinFun & BrokeAgent's math last few days
my 2 cents
___________________________

re: brokeagent "I'm expecting they will report that they have not reached a settlement July 9 and will ask the judge to put the trial back on the docket"
the demographic for jury won't change, c19 variants are mutating together (India B16172 & UK B16117 more lethal, so older folk won't be on jury pool)
the 13 will get the same results in court & they know it !
(running out of posts so tryna fit 2 in 1)

[BrokeAgent]

I think all of this talk of settlement is a bit premature, honestly. You'll recall the 13 asked for this delay pending the arbitration in June just a few weeks ago and Andrews denied their motion. I honestly don't think the 13 are acting in good faith with these settlement talks.

[AllinFun]

I agree. If the 20% is gone then it will mean fighting for what is ultimately a much larger number given the solid circumstances with this tech.

I think the writing is on the wall what we intend to do, so he might be preparing for the latter. Who knows at this point, all we can do is our part to protect our interests.