InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Restingzebra

05/26/21 1:49 PM

#340928 RE: CaptBeer #340921

Well done. Please consider sending to the Enquirer editor and op ed page.
icon url

Chemist2

05/26/21 3:41 PM

#340969 RE: CaptBeer #340921

Hi CaptBeer; Thank you for you great reply to Dr. Beckers incomplete analysis!!
icon url

Skipperdog11

05/26/21 4:32 PM

#340976 RE: CaptBeer #340921

"Skipper, here is the email I sent to Dr. Baker this morning. No reply yet."

CaptBeer- Thank you for all your efforts. Let us hope that logic and proper scientific inquiry once again rules the day.
icon url

Birdbrain Ideas

05/26/21 5:01 PM

#340983 RE: CaptBeer #340921

Thanks much for sending that letter. The doctor seemed purposefully misinformed and quick to let a line from a fellow doctor cut off any need to look more deeply into Vascepa.
icon url

sts66

05/27/21 12:48 PM

#341070 RE: CaptBeer #340921

Well done! Only thing I'd change is the conclusion that EPA levels don't matter - IIRC those who achieved the highest levels had moderately better results in R-IT, and we know from ANCHOR that 4 g of EPA does much better at reducing multiple biomarkers than 2 g did, including Apo(b).

You should send this to AMRN IR with an additional note that you keep finding articles like this bashing R-IT, and ask them why AMRN cannot produce positive articles by having the media interview R-IT supporters, and I don't mean Dr. Bhatt - I mean docs unrelated to AMRN and R-IT.