Replies to post #86489 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[zombywolf]

I am surprised there is not more public interest in this case. It has everything in a David vs Goliath scenario, and a bonus- Billy vs Deirdre spat and a potential ripoff of hundreds of shareholders. This case has it all.

[BrokeAgent]

Well, this is interesting. I wonder why the 13 have NOW, six years into the case, decided the Delaware Court lacks jurisdiction?

[I-Glow]

Jurisdiction is a very complex issue - it isn't District's location etc.

In the IP Clouding compliant against Amazon et el Judge Stark ruled:

"Based on a careful review of the provisions of the Symantec–Clouding Agreement, the Court finds that Clouding was not transferred formal legal title to Symantec's patents such that Clouding now qualifies as the “patentee.” Furthermore, while the Symantec–Clouding Agreement was drafted to convey some substantial rights to Clouding, Symantec retained enough of the bundle of rights (for each patent) that, when the Agreement is viewed as a whole, Clouding does not possess “all substantial rights.” As a result, Clouding's rights in the patents-in-suit do not amount to an ownership interest such that it can now be considered the “effective patentee.” antec–Clouding Agreement was drafted to convey some substantial rights to Clouding, Symantec retained enough of the bundle of rights (for each patent) that, when the Agreement is viewed as a whole, Clouding does not possess “all substantial rights.” As a result, Clouding's rights in the patents-in-suit do not amount to an ownership interest such that it can now be considered the “effective patentee.” Clouding, thus, lacks prudential standing to bring suit on its own without joining Symantec.

Due to this lack of standing, the Court finds it lacks subject matter jurisdiction and will grant Defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of standing. Appropriate orders will be entered in each of these related cases."

IG

[long uoip]

re: Chanbond Trial Streaming

576 05/17/2021 Letter to The Honorable Richard G. Andrews from Ronald P. Golden III regarding Chanbond Trial Streaming.

575 05/17/2021 Letter to The Honorable Richard G. Andrews from Jennifer Ying regarding defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction filed on Friday, May 14, 2021 [D.I. 572] - re [572] MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter.

DOCKET FILE > ChanBond, LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, et al

ChanBond, LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, et al.
Court Docket Sheet
District of Delaware
1:2015-cv-00842 (ded)

574 05/14/2021[SEALED] DECLARATION re [572] MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter -- Declaration of Krishnan Padmanabhan -- by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, Time Warner Cable Inc., WaveDivision Holdings, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-B)

573 05/14/2021[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re [572] MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter filed by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, Time Warner Cable Inc., WaveDivision Holdings, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 5/28/2021.

572 05/14/2021 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter - filed by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, Time Warner Cable Inc., WaveDivision Holdings, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC.