Replies to post #229519 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[OTC Whisperer]

No, this is called standard operating procedure. The division lawyers disputed, so they have to hear it out, no matter how desperate...so "fairly certain" doesnt play in to this...at all

"...I'm fairly certain that if the Board saw it that way, they would've already affirmed her ruling.

Foelak went to great lengths in her ID, trying to explain WHY she thought DBMM's case was different than others. If the Board agreed, this would have been over LONG AGO.

They obviously DON'T agree. THAT is why they granted the PFR..."

[BartDaddy]

The Board will have the final rule.

If the Board agreed, this would have been over LONG AGO.

Foelak's opinions each had citations in case law. By that same reasoning, if the Board disagreed, this would have been over LONG AGO.

From the looks of it, either the Board has not reviewed the ruling yet or the issues are not as cut and dried as some here seem to believe.

If the Board wants actual proof of DBMM's compliance they can review the last 2 or so years of compliant filings.

Any "spin" on things does not mean her ruling was incorrect, either.

My opinions only.