InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 14049
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 01/11/2004

Re: BartDaddy post# 229517

Friday, 04/16/2021 4:22:52 PM

Friday, April 16, 2021 4:22:52 PM

Post# of 348087
As for Foelak's "belief" that this case was unlike "other companies" cases?

I'm fairly certain that if the Board saw it that way, they would've already affirmed her ruling.

Foelak went to great lengths in her ID, trying to explain WHY she thought DBMM's case was different than others. If the Board agreed, this would have been over LONG AGO.

They obviously DON'T agree. THAT is why they granted the PFR. They want a closer look and some sort of actual proof that DBMM is actually compliant.

You're correct in that Foelak is able to rule any way she wants, to put any "spin" on things that she chooses to. But it doesn't mean her ruling was correct by the regulations.

That's why the BOARD will finally rule.


I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...if available, always try to present fact to back up your opinion.