InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Bouf

04/07/21 8:23 PM

#333781 RE: couldbebetter #333778

CB—

Correct, very troubling the biggest or one of biggest insurers does this. This shows the strength of the headwinds faced by the company irrespective of litigation over the patents.

Can anyone with more industry experience explain how the company could allow this to happen?

Will other Insurers follow?

B
icon url

zmanindc

04/07/21 8:33 PM

#333786 RE: couldbebetter #333778

I get the idea they want to maximize profit but that doesn’t work if they are covering GL over V. First, I don’t think GL is that much cheaper than V but every paid bottle is just a waste of money. They will not get the benefit of the ROI with the reduction in CV events. Just a waste of money and hurts UHC subscribers.
icon url

Meowza

04/07/21 11:11 PM

#333833 RE: couldbebetter #333778

significantly cheaper

How? Aneurysms and infarctions are expensive.
icon url

Number sleven

04/07/21 11:26 PM

#333834 RE: couldbebetter #333778

Could, They can not switch a prescription for Vascepa to generic lavaza. These two drugs are not equivalent. It would be the same as substituting aspirin for a prescription for crestor.
Sleven,