Replies to post #332906 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[north40000]

Of course it matters. Manipulating the evidence to make it appear to say something it does not actually say is always material as evidence of at least unfair, inequitable conduct. And here the Judge mistakingly copied the manipulated evidence into her opinion, and relied on what she copied, causing her to err in judgment/opinion.

[marzan]

bidmark, when it was cropped, doesn't matter even if Amarins attorneys didn't catch it because they are not statisticians or scientists. Was the table cropped by the Hikma team? was it not original from the Kura publication, no matter what, Hikma and Heincke is in big trouble; they costed Du her SC judge chance in the future ever. She is terribly pissed of now; I am Du, I would throw them into jail right now.

[ziploc_1]

Since the cropped table, as discussed in Judge Du's decision, was an important element in her decision, shouldn't this be a reason to declare a mistrial for the Amarin vs. Hickma case?