Replies to post #212182 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[Eicheljager]

How does this differ then from any other Trademark that LQMT might own and has granted to Eontec in section 3.1? In other words, the ownership is not shared, it is exclusively LQMT's. However it is granted as part of the Trademark License Grant to Eontec.

Is there language here that I am misinterpreting? We have granted Eon a Trademark license for "Liquidmetal", but LM106c cannot be used by Eon without a royalty because it was co-developed and isn't governed by section 3.1?

[jrs5]

Josh, the Trademark you reference belongs to Crucible, not LQMT....
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88862995&docId=ALW20200929010656#docIndex=10&page=1

Here is another on the same filing date that has different uses:
https://uspto.report/TM/88863010/APP20200410083800/

So I get that they have now included cell phones (CE), and medical, and auto in the Trademark. But it still belongs to Crucible. So I am not sure how this benefits LQMT as they do not own the Trademark.

[joshuaeyu]

Life will be even better after 3/30/21
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88863010&docId=ROA20210223193106#docIndex=1&page=1

Final amendment was added on 02/23/21
Note the choice of word "UNIQUE"
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88863010&docId=ROA20210223193106#docIndex=4&page=1

Applicant proposes to amend the following:

Current:
Class 006 for Metals and metal alloys; Amorphous metals; Common metals and their alloys; Metal castings; Metal hinges; Metal hardware, namely, springs, washers, nuts, pins, nails, screws, bolts, and rivets

Proposed:
Class 006 for Metals and metal alloys; Amorphous metals; Common metals and their alloys; Metal castings; Metal hinges; Metal hardware, namely, springs, washers, nuts, pins, nails, screws, bolts, and rivets; all of the foregoing made using or consisting substantially in part of a UNIQUE amorphous metal alloy