InvestorsHub Logo

alm2

02/20/21 3:48 AM

#325922 RE: marjac #325921

Marjac
And what you say leaves one incredulous as to why Amarin have not driven a Rule 60 challenge ....
Whilst I could see this might self expose Amarin and its lawyers to -put mildly- criticism -achieving success through Rule 60 resets the Amarin course
I am sure management and it’s lawyers in the wake of such a success could/would wriggle out of any such difficulty given the general euphoria that would ensue

Any idea why they have not taken up the Rule 60 gauntlet?? Have you been able to enter into a discourse with Amarin /Fish as to the proposed shareholder action ?? Surely they would have wished to make some observation /express a view
Alm

sts66

02/20/21 3:55 PM

#325993 RE: marjac #325921

No doubt AMRN HQ doesn't care which case resolves their problem as long as one of them does. Guess I'm just worried and PO'd that Du established precedent with weighing secondaries against each other, which is illogical, and could screw a lot more patent owners than AMRN in the end. I mean there are a ton of valuable stocks that depend on any patents (like all tech stocks), and this could really upset the applecart.