Replies to post #335242 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[kfa670]

Viking

but to ride this company to commercialization success

This current regime is not competent enough to accomplish this

They can't even get a Q filed on time and twice have "forgotten" the required filings to stay on the OTC.

Let's see TLD (successful), and a BO or JV

And *thank* the L's for not managing to drive this train off the tracks all these years.

[HappyLibrarian]

I'm not here to talk about the past. I'm here to be positive about this subject.

https://www.masslive.com/sports/2010/01/im_not_here_to_talk_about_the.html

[GoodGuyBill]

It doesn't matter what one's investment horizon is. Whether one's investment goal is a high single-digit sp or maximum sp growth via full commercialization, neither can happen without TLD. According to LP's own PRs, they have TLD. forget the journal, forget Les's absurd/amature discussion of DCVax-L in a basement bar streamed over the internet. WTF?! We were told ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS that we would get tld or an update. I am merely asking for tld or an update. Why is that a problem?

Well, we all have different investment goals. Mine is not to see this go to a high single digit SP, but to ride this company to commercialization success.

This comment is absurd. You invested in NWBO because of data, much of which was collected 'Back in my day'. If you think about it what you have done is prioritized the trial data and endpoints as important and relegated LP's governance issues and missed timelines as unimportant. I get it. I was where you were six months ago. Your position may be correct for you or it may be an indication of a lack of DD on your part. I wonder how you would feel in, let's say, 6 months or a year or more if we still don't have tld? Will you care then? Imho, it is NEVER good to continuously give leaders a pass on this shit...especially when a pattern has been established.

Let me just say this to you comment: Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it. The future is never totally divorced from the past. In fact I would suggest that the future is a often a product of (or shaped by) the past. Absurd.

I really find it funny when people write the old 'Back in my day' posts to me, because I really could care less about what has already happened. I worry about the future, not the past.

No need to take this personal with a I'm-not-on-your-team attitude. My use of the term, "team" was to mean "fellow investor". You are a fellow investor with me and everyone else. You are wrong to refer to people who are asking management to do what they say or provide timely updates (LIKE THEY PROMISED TO DO) as 'short-sighted'. It isn't short-sighted. It's appropriate and damn sure reasonable.

But it's also reasonable for us to disagree. I think we've exhausted this topic. Good luck to you.

Also, I am not on any team with people who are shortsighted in their investment goals. I would be if I was trading in this stock, but I am not. I would rather see this done right than done now.

You do know that longs, including yours truly, were saying this 2/3 years ago. Furthermore, they should have TLD by now. Why would tld not be done right after all of this time? Just saying...

I would rather see this done right than done now.