Replies to post #306536 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[HDGabor]

d-

By Hikma taking no action( beyond the label)to prevent this infringement, knowingly supplying to those that will infringe, may constitute an act(s) to induce or indirectly infringe( contributory)

Nope (as substantial non infringing use - MARINE - exists).

a substantial non infringing use does not guarantee protection from contributory or indirect infringement

a.)a substantial non infringing use ALWAYS guarantee protection from contributory infringement
b.)a substantial non infringing NEVER guarantee protection (and never save) from induced infringement. Induced infringement depends on specific action. If the action exists, induced infringement exists. If no, no. Substantial non infringing us is irrelevant for ACTUAL induced infringement, it could guarantee protection from FUTURE, THEORETICAL inducement.

Best,
G