Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[dukesking]

HDG, my only hope for contributory infringement (paraphrasing) is that a manufacturer that is aware of the patent and knowingly sells a product to a third party that they know will( does) sell or promote the product in an infringing manner is guilty of contributory infringement. By Hikma taking no action( beyond the label)to prevent this infringement, knowingly supplying to those that will infringe, may constitute an act(s) to induce or indirectly infringe( contributory). Generics know that third parties will infringe by nature of the laws, policies and mandates to promote or otherwise automatically substitute the patented brand for a generic, is contributory infringement and willful blindness to it. Additionally, as you know, a substantial non infringing use does not guarantee protection from contributory or indirect infringement. I agree that GV does have a substantial non infringing use but that’s only one part of the equation. Selling to PBM, states, pharmacies and the like that promote or have policies that promote or induce by law, mandate or policy, could be liable for contributory infringement. IMHO Please let me know your thought. Thanks.