Replies to post #304141 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Tal10]

Rule 62.1 in conjunction with 60(b)?

[HinduKush]

THERE IS A SOLUTION ANOTHER THIRD PARTY SHOULD WRITE AN AMICUS THAT POINTS OUT THE SIMULTANEOUS FRAUD IN MISREPRESENTING MORI--CURFMAN BHAAT PENCINA ARE PLACED TO DO IT SINCE THEY WROTE THE ARTICLE IN NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY-- I SUSPECT THEIR HAND MAY BE EITHER STAYED OR PERSUADED BY AMARIN--BACK TO THERO ET AL.

[marjac]

alm, I think the remedy as has been discussed throughout the Board, is a Rule 60 Motion for Relief from Judgment, which is made in the District Court in Nevada. The grounds are mistake (Bhatt), fraud/misrepresentation (Heinecke/Cropped Table), and fraud on the court (Heinecke/Cropped Table).

The reality is that in this type of proceeding, en banc, the court is not concerned about statistical flaws affecting only this case. This is why Markman opined that referencing the Bhatt Report would ensure rejection of the en banc Petition.