InvestorsHub Logo

HinduKush

10/01/20 10:31 AM

#302392 RE: ilovetech #302371

ILT
You have captured the essence of it; MORI is scientifically dust and air. it is Kurabayshi which formed the ultimate basis of patent allowability by USPTO. Covington defended the wrong gate of the castle(Mori) --they should have been defending Kurabayashi (the crown jewels).

DU agreed with the USPTO to reject BUT/FOR Mori, but falsely stated BUT/FOR Kura, when indeed, if NOT/FOR Kura the patents would not have been granted.

SO LDL AND STUDY POPULATION WAS A DISTRACTION. IF NOT/FOR KURA "UNEXPECTED" APO-B REDUCTION," NO VASCEPA.



Those who doubt what ILT and I say should read from pages 106-112 of teh enclosed document:
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:bbe181a4-7c66-4d5a-8fb2-df663549e3bb
https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2020/10/1/qezt[uspto_thought_process.png

lizzy241

10/01/20 11:02 AM

#302402 RE: ilovetech #302371

ILT, thanks for differentiating all the misleading words that have been posted. It's so difficult to understand the use of BUT and NOT.