Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[ilovetech]

8- quote: "Du relied on Mori-that's why MORI must be refuted NOT Kurabayashl. It doesn't matter what you think is essential--what matters is Du's reasoning."

Respectfully, IMO, you have fallen for the trap set up by the defense. Du concluded Prima facia obviousness first. In order to get there, she needed to knock off each objective indicia like ducks at a carnival shooting gallery.

DU agreed with the USPTO to reject BUT/FOR Mori, but falsely stated BUT/FOR Kura, when indeed, if NOT/FOR Kura the patents would not have been granted.

SO LDL AND STUDY POPULATION WAS A DISTRACTION. IF NOT/FOR KURA "UNEXPECTED" APO-B REDUCTION," NO VASCEPA.

The Defense understood that Kura had to be discredited to show that the USPTO DID NOT CONSIDER KURA. THEREFORE APO-B reduction is a ruse, B.S, fake news, not real... It worked, as we see on this board, the fallacy continues to stick.

ILT