InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Cardiologymd

09/05/20 12:18 PM

#296676 RE: marjac #296669

The best hope would be to possible sie insurance companies as they would be the only ones directly infringing on reduce it patents.
icon url

Jasbg

09/05/20 12:48 PM

#296701 RE: marjac #296669

marjac@ I have personally been in a range of businesses for +40 years - and have always lived by the rule - move on as fast as possible after 'a battle lost' - accept it and 'move on' - or you risk ending up as a bitter old man 'that hates the whole world - much like 'you know who' in this forum.
--------------------

This post mainly to acknowledge those of you who have both the energy and the skills - to take up the Legal battle - after these horrendous unjust law-cases against Amarin. You have my full support, and respect for your effort - and always will have.
--------------------

I have a question (probably been answered a number of times - I just did not see it).

How is the judges of CAFC selected for a specific case.

Who does it ? Is it 100% random - done by machine/computer ?

Amarin faith decided - by 3 democratic appointed judges - is that 100% by chance ?
---------------------------------

All 12 judges can not know every complicated case - how long time do the 'appointed judges' have to research a case. How long in advance do they know - the cases they are selected for ?

Jasbg
icon url

md3434

09/06/20 11:16 AM

#296923 RE: marjac #296669

Quote: Hence the collapse of the stock after the Du decision, and again after being affirmed, as the US market is lost.

Michael, when you state the above, can you clarify if this is your belief from a legal perspective or both a legal and practical perspective?

If Amarin is still the only entity that can grow the reduce-it market thru marketing in the US at this time, then that position still has great value to the generics, no?

If this has been clarified previously and I missed it, my apologies.