InvestorsHub Logo

ziploc_1

09/05/20 12:28 AM

#296564 RE: johnking29 #296560

John...I disagree...This case is important because it establishes, for the first time, a new and different legal theory with respect to how objective indicia should be considered... As there was no written discussion by the panel, the case now merits a written opinion en banc.

iwishiknew

09/05/20 2:48 AM

#296569 RE: johnking29 #296560

HK + HAMOA + NORTH + ATTORNEYS

If you have a few minutes you will probably find this short article interesting.
Judge Michel, Panelists Contemplate the CAFC Past, Present and Future on Day Two of CON2020
9/2/2020 -- note the ignominious date

Judge Paul Michel is a retired U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Chief Judge.

https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2020/09/02/federal-circuit-today-judge-michel-panelists-contemplate-courts-past-present-future-day-two-con2020/id=124826/

There is a short section on Excessive Use of Rule 36.
Suggest reading down to comments- interesting. Maybe consider adding a comment there re 20-1723