InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

momoney24

08/22/20 2:58 PM

#292291 RE: sts66 #292290

I agree with you, but my opinion holds little value. It would take me some time to dig up, but I remember coming across at least two recent cases shared here where the “unfavorable panel” came to a “favorable” decision.

I don’t like playing the odds game because each and every case stands on its own, but from what my layman brain can gather, it seems like we should have a shot with even the most undesirable panel.
icon url

Jasbg

08/22/20 3:10 PM

#292294 RE: sts66 #292290

sts@ Agreed 100%. The credibility of Law Systems of America is at stake here.

And it is actually 'the other way around'. The system of 'not knowing' in advance the 3 Judges of CAFC is precisely to 'secure against' possible corruption/outside buying specific Judges.

Until proved otherwise - I will place full trust in that US Justice/Law systems will 'In the End' - correct the errors of Nevada ruling.

Jasbg