InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JosephS

07/20/20 10:53 AM

#621638 RE: skeptic7 #621637

I have personally wanted this at SCOTUS since July 2013. Disagree with your assessment but you are allowed to think however you want.

icon url

imtheshadow

07/20/20 11:06 AM

#621640 RE: skeptic7 #621637

skeptic, i would be fully in your court except for the en banc decision and sweeney's pointed comments likening the gov't behavior to the mob ... having said that, I have been unable to understand the optimism for any near term outcome, much less a favorable one, and agree the likely one year delay (+ growing delinquencies/defaults) could depress share price further ... who would have ever thought our own gov't, especially under DT, would have done this and/or continue to fight against a reasonable settlement ...
icon url

Potty

07/20/20 11:46 AM

#621645 RE: skeptic7 #621637

Skeptic, I was refering to all the BULLS here who think plaintiffs will get a favorable SCOTUS ruling...