InvestorsHub Logo

postes

07/17/20 4:43 PM

#286731 RE: sts66 #286730

ST66...who in their right mind would put that in print..


"still can't believe JT admitted "investors" dictated what was acceptable settlement terms with Hikma."

lizzy241

07/17/20 4:57 PM

#286735 RE: sts66 #286730

sts66
where was this statement posted, it's ridiculous.

still can't believe JT admitted "investors" dictated what was acceptable settlement terms with Hikma.

lizzy241

02/23/21 5:55 PM

#326457 RE: sts66 #286730

sts66, please see post #286762, still can't believe JT wrote this reply!


postes Member Level Friday, 07/17/20 06:31:37 PM
Re: lizzy241 post# 286735 0
Post #
286762
of 326456
Lizzy...here is What JT wrote

Your first judgment assumes that a settlement was available on terms that you would not have been similarly disappointing. We listened to input from many investors over the past several years. Such input included suggestions on what would be settlement terms that they would accept. The settlement terms that were suggested by investors were not available and we emphasized for many years that the courts can be unpredictable in such matters (which the ANDA filers knew as well and it cost them little to pursue this matter). The confidential nature of such court overseen settlement discussions prevent disclosure of further details.
Private Reply | Keep | Public Reply | View Replies (1) | Mark as Last Read[color=red][/color]