InvestorsHub Logo

sts66

07/17/20 6:20 PM

#286758 RE: lizzy241 #286735

I paraphrased - but that's exactly what JT meant in his email. Not going to bother to find the original post, but if you've kept up with the board over the last 36 hrs you know I'm not the only one who parsed his words in that way.

postes

07/17/20 6:31 PM

#286762 RE: lizzy241 #286735

Lizzy...here is What JT wrote

Your first judgment assumes that a settlement was available on terms that you would not have been similarly disappointing. We listened to input from many investors over the past several years. Such input included suggestions on what would be settlement terms that they would accept. The settlement terms that were suggested by investors were not available and we emphasized for many years that the courts can be unpredictable in such matters (which the ANDA filers knew as well and it cost them little to pursue this matter). The confidential nature of such court overseen settlement discussions prevent disclosure of further details.
Private Reply | Keep | Public Reply | View Replies (1) | Mark as Last Read[color=red][/color]