BB., quote: "There’s more than speculation Amarin was overconfident in winning Du case, this poisoned settlement discussions. The details of those discussions are less important than the actual coin flip...."
If the high level consensus had always been, that Amarin's patents were a coinflip from infringement or a patent loss, Amarin would have been "negligent" for not selling after receiving the Marine label in the first place. Am I to believe, that Amarin embarked on Reduce-it, assuming that although they understood their patents weren't airtight, that they just assumed, they would settle cases for years to come? Come on man! Really?
ILT
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
